Pages

Friday, 9 May 2008

QFry

For a short time a theist but more an atheist, Stephen Fry is interesting for many reasons. Intelligent, witty, vulnerable and an all-round good egg, in Celebrity Land he’s one of those people who pop up everywhere.

Actor, performer, compere, author. Director, composer, biographer. Stage, screen, television, radio and the written word. Just take a look at his IMDB or Wikipedia entry to see all the things he’s been in, all the things he’s been involved with.

Whether it’s the Cambridge Footlights Revue or Peter’s Friends, Absolute Power or Stormbreaker, Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy or Bright Young Things, The Young Ones or Gormenghast, Tales of the Riverbank or Jeeves and Wooster, Fry and Laurie or Kingdom, Doctor Who or Qi, he never fails to entertain.

Fry has often commented on belief and, in 2006, with Christopher Hitchens, he took part in the Blasphemy Debate at the Guardian Hay Festival.

His standpoint is well summed up in this article in the Observer, where Fry is quoted thus:

I've always believed that everything that is said from authority is either the authority of one's own heart, one's own brain, one's own reading, one's own trust, but not the authority of someone who claims it because they're speaking for God and they know the truth because it's written in a book. That, essentially, is where I come from. In a sense, tolerance is my religion. Reason is my religion.

1 comment:

  1. I am aware of Fry's atheism as he became "a distinguished supporter" of the British Humanist Association some time ago.

    Following this, and when I was still secretary of the Gay and Lesbian Humanist Association, I invited him to join its panel of vice-presidents. Regrettably he politely declined.

    ReplyDelete

We welcome lively and challenging comments. However, please try to stay on topic, be polite and do not use abusive, racist or sexist language, and do not incite your readers to violence or other antisocial behaviour, or your comment will be deleted. This isn't censorship: it's a case of staying within the bounds of decency and having an eye to the law, although we realise the law will be different in different countries.

We do not bar anonymous comments at the moment, but we would prefer that those commenting play fair and use their name or at least a regular nom de plume. It does show a confidence in your convictions. We know, too, that it's easy to use a false name and be effectively anonymous, but, again, we appeal to your sense of good practice. Even a wacky nom de plume is better, since at least readers will come to know that contributor and maybe remember her or his previous comments.

Blatant commercial advertising will be removed.

Comments should not be construed as necessarily the policy or opinion of the Pink Triangle Trust.

Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.