Pages

Tuesday, 14 April 2009

Unfinished business

The world is about to end. Again!

This time it’s not because mosques are out of alignment. It’s all down to mobile phones.

I kid you not.

According to the Scotsman, an Indian Muslim organisation has issued a fatwa over mobile-phone etiquette.

Is this because the mobile phones are ringing out in the mosque in the middle of Friday prayers? No.

Are people texting when they should be praying? Nope.

Using their vibrate mode to induce an interesting sexual experience? No again.

Dying to know?

In the north Indian city of Kanpur, a panel of clerics from the Islamic group Jamia Ashraf-ul-Madaris has set new rules over using phones.

The panel objected to the use of aayats (verses from the Koran) as ringtones. It argues that people answer calls halfway through the aayat, leaving the verse incomplete.

Ghyasuddin, a senior cleric, said: “This kind of action amounts to a gunah [sin].”

So now you know. The verse is incomplete, so Allah will no doubt send his avenging angel to smite the guilty – and, we assume, their mobile phones.

Good job Christians haven’t cottoned onto this idea. You can just see the train carriage full of people getting calls on their mobiles – as so often happens – and they’re all sitting there waiting for the Lord’s Prayer to reach the “for ever and ever, amen” bit before they press the button and say, “Hello? I’m on a train.”

But it could be even worse: it could be the entire Decalogue or the Nicene Creed.

2 comments:

  1. Oh FFS. I swear I've never seen a bunch of people who find so much to get irate over, as well as make idiotic regulations about.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Hmmm, I want to have 1 Timothy 2:11 on my cell phone. But then I'd probably be beaten silly by the females nearby.

    ReplyDelete

We welcome lively and challenging comments. However, please try to stay on topic, be polite and do not use abusive, racist or sexist language, and do not incite your readers to violence or other antisocial behaviour, or your comment will be deleted. This isn't censorship: it's a case of staying within the bounds of decency and having an eye to the law, although we realise the law will be different in different countries.

We do not bar anonymous comments at the moment, but we would prefer that those commenting play fair and use their name or at least a regular nom de plume. It does show a confidence in your convictions. We know, too, that it's easy to use a false name and be effectively anonymous, but, again, we appeal to your sense of good practice. Even a wacky nom de plume is better, since at least readers will come to know that contributor and maybe remember her or his previous comments.

Blatant commercial advertising will be removed.

Comments should not be construed as necessarily the policy or opinion of the Pink Triangle Trust.

Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.