Pages

▼

Monday, 20 February 2012

Right-wing nutjobs go on and on about gay marriage – again


The Christian homophobes are a real hoot. They’ve launched a new organisation today called the Coalition for Marriage (read “Coalition for Traditional, Man–Woman, Normal, Proper, Good, God-approved, Bible-approved, Decent, Seemly, Acceptable-To-All-Right-Thinking-People Marriage”).

Behind it are a pair of the usual suspects: the former Archbish of Cant, George Carey, and the Christian Institute.

You can read about Peter Tatchell’s views on the new coalition here.

And in the Daily Mail today, Carey says – get this – “The state does not own marriage . . .”

Quite. And nor does the church. Oh, hang on a minute . . .

“The honourable estate of matrimony precedes both the state and the church, and neither of these institutions have the right to redefine it in such a fundamental way.”

OK, so who does own marriage, then, apart from the couples concerned?

As for ownership – or lack of it – by the state, you seem to have been happy for centuries for the state to legitimise marriage by recognising opposite-sex unions in law. If the state doesn’t own marriage, why have you not objected to the state’s interference in what should be an arrangement between one person and another (and, you would no doubt wish me to add, God)?

And Colin Hart of the right-wing Christian Institute says in the same article: “The word marriage is woven into the fabric of our national laws. That can’t be just unpicked in a single stroke.”

But it can, Mr Hart, it can. Governments “unpick” all the time when one piece of legislation overturns another – whether it’s been there for centuries, years or months.
Posted

1 comment:

  1. Stuart HartillSat Feb 25, 05:52:00 pm GMT

    Dunno about the ownership of marriage, but I'm starting to think Carey's got the market monopoly on idiocy.
    Picture the scene at the Daily Mail. Government comes up with something fairly sensible, and the editor says to himself, "Right, were can we find some idiot to slag that off? Can't be Stephen Green, he's still sulking since we covered the way he treats his wife and kids.... Sod it, it'll have to be Carey again. Everyone else has joined the 21st century."

    ReplyDelete

We welcome lively and challenging comments. However, please try to stay on topic, be polite and do not use abusive, racist or sexist language, and do not incite your readers to violence or other antisocial behaviour, or your comment will be deleted. This isn't censorship: it's a case of staying within the bounds of decency and having an eye to the law, although we realise the law will be different in different countries.

We do not bar anonymous comments at the moment, but we would prefer that those commenting play fair and use their name or at least a regular nom de plume. It does show a confidence in your convictions. We know, too, that it's easy to use a false name and be effectively anonymous, but, again, we appeal to your sense of good practice. Even a wacky nom de plume is better, since at least readers will come to know that contributor and maybe remember her or his previous comments.

Blatant commercial advertising will be removed.

Comments should not be construed as necessarily the policy or opinion of the Pink Triangle Trust.

Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.