At the centre is the Schools Secretary Ed Balls, who is accused of an outrageous attack on 87 Jewish, Anglican and Catholic schools and undermining their religious ethos.
"The schools were reprimanded for using banned admissions policies to weed out children from poor homes, including charging parents up-front fees for ostensibly free state education," according to a story in the Daily Telegraph, which continues:
One Anglican and five Jewish schools were identified as asking for "voluntary" contributions as a condition of entry. One Jewish primary wanted almost £2,700 a year for extra security and Jewish studies classes, which are not funded by the taxpayer.
Balls is accused of trying to divert attention from the fact that 100,000 parents failed to get their their kids into the schools of their choice.
The Board of Deputies of British Jews said in a statement, "All parties accept that financial contributions must be voluntary. It is important to remember that these are primarily fees for security or religious instruction, neither of which is paid for by the Government."
Nor should "religious instruction" be paid for by the government. But security? What do they mean? Do they need extra security over and above other buildings? If so, what is the threat? If there's an identifiable, constant threat, where are the police? But we digress.
Kevin Hoare, head of Finchley Catholic High School, spoke on behalf of other heads in the borough, describing the list as a "smokescreen" and accusing the government of attacking religious schools.
"There is an anti-faith-schools agenda at the moment and this may be part of it," he said.
Given the British government's willingness to kowtow to people of questionable beliefs of all stripes and hues, is this a credible accusation? Has there been such a sea change since disturbingly religious Tony Blair left office?
For his part, Balls insists that there's no war on religion-based education, insisting that the Catholic Education Service, Church of England and Board of Deputies of British Jews back the new admissions code. The schools' "credibility" depends on their operating fair admissions, he says, and has ordered town halls to crack down on schools flouting admissions rules.
No comments:
Post a Comment
We welcome lively and challenging comments. However, please try to stay on topic, be polite and do not use abusive, racist or sexist language, and do not incite your readers to violence or other antisocial behaviour, or your comment will be deleted. This isn't censorship: it's a case of staying within the bounds of decency and having an eye to the law, although we realise the law will be different in different countries.
We do not bar anonymous comments at the moment, but we would prefer that those commenting play fair and use their name or at least a regular nom de plume. It does show a confidence in your convictions. We know, too, that it's easy to use a false name and be effectively anonymous, but, again, we appeal to your sense of good practice. Even a wacky nom de plume is better, since at least readers will come to know that contributor and maybe remember her or his previous comments.
Blatant commercial advertising will be removed.
Comments should not be construed as necessarily the policy or opinion of the Pink Triangle Trust.
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.