Pages

Monday, 21 April 2008

We hate to say we told you so

Well, it had to come out sooner or later, but it's not been the best-kept secret of all time, has it? Yes, the new "social evil" is religion. At least that's according to a poll carried out by the Joseph Rountree Foundation.

According to The Times, the Foundation's poll of 3,500 people has "uncovered a widespread belief that faith – not just in its extreme form – was intolerant, irrational and used to justify persecution". Pollsters had asked subjects "what they considered to be the worst blights on modern society, updating a list drawn up by Rowntree, a Quaker, 104 years ago".

The story continues, "The responses may [sic] well have dismayed him. The researchers found that the 'dominant opinion' was that religion was a 'social evil'." (Just how they "may" have dismayed him when he wasn't around when they were published is known only by the Times writer, Robert Watts, who might have chosen "might", but for the fact that he didn't – but I digress.)

One subject is quoted as saying, "Faith in supernatural phenomena inspires hatred and prejudice throughout the world, and is commonly used as justification for persecution of women, gays and people who do not have faith."

Well, we hate to say we told you so.
__________
FOOTNOTE: If you want to see how adherence to some of religion's barmier edicts may be killing us off, read this. It's sobering stuff.

No comments:

Post a Comment

We welcome lively and challenging comments. However, please try to stay on topic, be polite and do not use abusive, racist or sexist language, and do not incite your readers to violence or other antisocial behaviour, or your comment will be deleted. This isn't censorship: it's a case of staying within the bounds of decency and having an eye to the law, although we realise the law will be different in different countries.

We do not bar anonymous comments at the moment, but we would prefer that those commenting play fair and use their name or at least a regular nom de plume. It does show a confidence in your convictions. We know, too, that it's easy to use a false name and be effectively anonymous, but, again, we appeal to your sense of good practice. Even a wacky nom de plume is better, since at least readers will come to know that contributor and maybe remember her or his previous comments.

Blatant commercial advertising will be removed.

Comments should not be construed as necessarily the policy or opinion of the Pink Triangle Trust.

Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.