Pages

Wednesday, 9 July 2008

Permit us to be annoyed, say Catholics

If you say anything that annoys a Catholic in New South Wales at the moment, you can be done for it. But now, according to the Ekklesia think tank, some Catholics have taken exception to this. They don't want that degree of protection from "annoyance", it seems, if that gets in the way of social justice.

The new laws were brought in to prevent criticism of or annoyance to Catholics – effectively gagging people from openly criticising – during the World Youth Day in Sydney, which Pope Ratzinger will be attending. This is being held from 15 to 20 July.

Protesters can be fined up to A$5,500 for causing annoyance or inconvenience to Youth Day participants, says Ekklesia, which continues:

The Edmund Rice Centre, an Australian Catholic advocacy organisation, claimed that the laws introduced in New South Wales to restrict protests are contrary to Catholic traditions of social justice. "These laws significantly dampen our right to freedom of speech and to demonstrate inside or outside the church," a spokesperson for the centre, John Sweeney, told Ecumenical News International on 4 July.

But the authorities may have their work cut out, since there seems to be a lively trade in anti-Pope materials, including T-shirts such as the one above. Who's going to spend all that money to make an anti-Pope fashion statement, and then not turn up to the party?

No comments:

Post a Comment

We welcome lively and challenging comments. However, please try to stay on topic, be polite and do not use abusive, racist or sexist language, and do not incite your readers to violence or other antisocial behaviour, or your comment will be deleted. This isn't censorship: it's a case of staying within the bounds of decency and having an eye to the law, although we realise the law will be different in different countries.

We do not bar anonymous comments at the moment, but we would prefer that those commenting play fair and use their name or at least a regular nom de plume. It does show a confidence in your convictions. We know, too, that it's easy to use a false name and be effectively anonymous, but, again, we appeal to your sense of good practice. Even a wacky nom de plume is better, since at least readers will come to know that contributor and maybe remember her or his previous comments.

Blatant commercial advertising will be removed.

Comments should not be construed as necessarily the policy or opinion of the Pink Triangle Trust.

Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.