gay and lesbian matters, rationalism, atheism, freethought, secularism — this is the weblog of the Pink Triangle Trust, the only gay humanist charity
Pages
Sunday, 24 August 2008
Respect, but not as we know it
It’s no secret that Obama is religious – in his own words, he’s “a Christian [with] a deep faith. I'm rooted in the Christian tradition. I believe that there are many paths to the same place, and that is a belief that there is a higher power, a belief that we are connected as a people.”
And today saw the first-ever interfaith gathering held at the Convention. A gathering that has specifically excluded those thousands of Democrats who are of no faith, despite the Democratic Party’s much heralded need for inclusiveness and bridge-building after this summer’s long-drawn-out battle between Obama and Hillary Clinton to become the party nominee.
Ron Millar of the Secular Coalition for America wrote to Leah Daughtry, CEO of the Democratic National Committee and organiser of the interfaith event, to ask where “people of no faith” should go while other Democrats are being unified.
Apparently, Daughtry didn’t have the Christian courtesy to reply to Millar. She did, however, speak to the Associated Press: “Atheists speaking at an interfaith service … does that work? I don't quite know. But they’re part of the party, you treat them with respect.”
First, how did she think she was treating “people of no faith” with respect by lumping them all together as atheists?
How did she think she was treating “people of no faith” with respect by not inviting even one secularist to speak at the “unity” event?
And, finally, how did she think she was treating “people of no faith” with respect by claiming that “Democrats have been, are and will continue to be people of faith – and this interfaith gathering is proof of that”?
God knows!
4 comments:
We welcome lively and challenging comments. However, please try to stay on topic, be polite and do not use abusive, racist or sexist language, and do not incite your readers to violence or other antisocial behaviour, or your comment will be deleted. This isn't censorship: it's a case of staying within the bounds of decency and having an eye to the law, although we realise the law will be different in different countries.
We do not bar anonymous comments at the moment, but we would prefer that those commenting play fair and use their name or at least a regular nom de plume. It does show a confidence in your convictions. We know, too, that it's easy to use a false name and be effectively anonymous, but, again, we appeal to your sense of good practice. Even a wacky nom de plume is better, since at least readers will come to know that contributor and maybe remember her or his previous comments.
Blatant commercial advertising will be removed.
Comments should not be construed as necessarily the policy or opinion of the Pink Triangle Trust.
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.
Gay Jihad http://www.jihadwatch.org/dhimmiwatch/archives/022338.php
ReplyDeleteIt worries me a lot that the American electorate feel it is so important the a belief in the right invisible friend is so important. It worries me even more that the man that has such a powerful position and influence can openly admit to this delusion. I must admit I had expected more from obama lets hope it is just "election propaganda" and not something he will base his decisions on.
ReplyDeleteThank you for the invigorating and overwhelming accolade, I doubt I deserve it but will endeavour to manage at least one post to live up to it
Baal's Bum is being modest in thanking us for the accolade but not pointing readers to it. You can find it here. And his blog is here.
ReplyDeleteMr Armitage you are too kind
ReplyDelete