Pages

Monday, 4 August 2008

Splits within splits

It's not just the Anglican Communion as a whole that is split over gays, but the Episcopal Church within it, according to this piece in the Republican American.

Episcopalians, it says, keep insisting it's "not about gays".

But, as American Episcopal bishops return home from an international religious conference this week, it's clear that the "gay issue" is one that continues to split the Episcopal church. Since the 2003 consecration of the first openly gay bishop, V. Gene Robinson, Anglicans have been divided over their approach to gay priests, gay marriage and who holds ultimate authority in the communion of 77 million followers around the world.

That international religious conference was, of course, Lambeth, the ten-yearly powwow attended by the world's Anglican bishops. But this year a quarter of them stayed away, because they think the Episcopalians are very naughty for voting for and then consecrating Bishop Gene Robinson in New Hampshire.

The conference, in Canterbury, showed "no ability to suture [the Church's] wounds", the paper tells us. It was not intended to make binding decisions, but "the strife within the church was so deep that more than 200 conservative bishops from Africa, Asia and North America boycotted the meeting entirely, convening in Jerusalem instead".

No comments:

Post a Comment

We welcome lively and challenging comments. However, please try to stay on topic, be polite and do not use abusive, racist or sexist language, and do not incite your readers to violence or other antisocial behaviour, or your comment will be deleted. This isn't censorship: it's a case of staying within the bounds of decency and having an eye to the law, although we realise the law will be different in different countries.

We do not bar anonymous comments at the moment, but we would prefer that those commenting play fair and use their name or at least a regular nom de plume. It does show a confidence in your convictions. We know, too, that it's easy to use a false name and be effectively anonymous, but, again, we appeal to your sense of good practice. Even a wacky nom de plume is better, since at least readers will come to know that contributor and maybe remember her or his previous comments.

Blatant commercial advertising will be removed.

Comments should not be construed as necessarily the policy or opinion of the Pink Triangle Trust.

Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.