For an interesting analysis of Britain’s kowtowing to a primitive, foreign and unfair court system, which it allows to run alongside its own secular system, disadvantaging women, turn to the International Herald Tribune.
Perhaps it can look with a little more objectivity at the issue. But anyone reading the article cannot help but think we’re heading for disaster by allowing incomers and their descendants just to set up courts according to their own religion and expect the host country to sit back and see British women – for that is what these Muslim women are – being treated like shit in deference to Dark Ages “justice”.
We’ve seen how violence is treated, too, in a case we’ve reported on this blog (see second indented extract quoted there) that told how violent assailants had just been told to go away and have counselling and consult the odd mojo man – sorry, imam. All to the detriment of the women victims.
The fact is that these “judges” have no specialist knowledge of British jurisprudence, by which all citizens should be judged, not just those who aren’t Muslims, and the British government is lying supine and allowing yet more creeping Islamisation because it is too gutless to take decisive action and say enough is enough, this is Britain, this is our system, you will abide by it or go elsewhere.
See Pink Triangle’s last post on the issue here.
No comments:
Post a Comment
We welcome lively and challenging comments. However, please try to stay on topic, be polite and do not use abusive, racist or sexist language, and do not incite your readers to violence or other antisocial behaviour, or your comment will be deleted. This isn't censorship: it's a case of staying within the bounds of decency and having an eye to the law, although we realise the law will be different in different countries.
We do not bar anonymous comments at the moment, but we would prefer that those commenting play fair and use their name or at least a regular nom de plume. It does show a confidence in your convictions. We know, too, that it's easy to use a false name and be effectively anonymous, but, again, we appeal to your sense of good practice. Even a wacky nom de plume is better, since at least readers will come to know that contributor and maybe remember her or his previous comments.
Blatant commercial advertising will be removed.
Comments should not be construed as necessarily the policy or opinion of the Pink Triangle Trust.
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.