Pages

Friday, 3 April 2009

Gay sex should be legal – but . . .

A Zambian AIDS activist who’s also a Jesuit priest says same-sex relations should be decriminalised, and that the existence of laws banning such relations is “fanning the spread of HIV”, says Ekklesia, the Christian think tank.

But there’s a “but”.

Michael Kelly told a workshop on the role of the media and parliamentary involvement on HIV and AIDS, held in the Zambian capital recently, “The continued prevalence of such laws is driving people in same-sex relations underground and making authorities stubborn to the fact that even prisoners are having sex in prison.”

He said that instead of “criminalising” sexual orientation, southern African countries should follow the South African example and legalise gay partnerships, “to ensure access to prevention and treatment, as well as the involvement of these people and prisoners in the battle against the epidemic”.

But here’s the rub. Ekklesia says, “Still, Kelly later told Ecumenical News International, ‘I am not saying I support men-to-men sex.’ ”

Well, Mr Kelly, if you came out into the real world and did openly support it, and campaigned for acceptance as well as legalisation – important thought the latter is, of course – you might manage to change some hearts, and that might lead to changing some laws.

Saying, “I don’t approve of this but I think you ought to let it happen” is less likely to work.

No comments:

Post a Comment

We welcome lively and challenging comments. However, please try to stay on topic, be polite and do not use abusive, racist or sexist language, and do not incite your readers to violence or other antisocial behaviour, or your comment will be deleted. This isn't censorship: it's a case of staying within the bounds of decency and having an eye to the law, although we realise the law will be different in different countries.

We do not bar anonymous comments at the moment, but we would prefer that those commenting play fair and use their name or at least a regular nom de plume. It does show a confidence in your convictions. We know, too, that it's easy to use a false name and be effectively anonymous, but, again, we appeal to your sense of good practice. Even a wacky nom de plume is better, since at least readers will come to know that contributor and maybe remember her or his previous comments.

Blatant commercial advertising will be removed.

Comments should not be construed as necessarily the policy or opinion of the Pink Triangle Trust.

Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.