They’re not happy with saying grace before meals at Cambridge University’s all-women Newnham College.
So they’ve brought in a nonreligious version.
The traditional version addressed thanks to “Jesum Christum dominum nostrum” – Jesus Christ our Lord.
The new grace reads: “Pro cibo inter esurientes, pro comitate inter desolatos, pro pace inter bellantes, gratias agimus.”
That means, “For food in a hungry world, for companionship in a world of loneliness, for peace in an age of violence, we give thanks.”
But who’s receiving the thanks? The world, Earth, Mother Nature, Gaia, presumably.
It hasn’t pleased everyone. Mary Beard, who is a fellow of Newnham, said the change was an insult to Latin.
Writing online, she said, “The undergraduates’ rewrite was a classic case of disguising a load of well-meaning platitudes in some posh dead language, which was actually an insult to that dead language.
“Could we imagine getting up and saying this in English? No. Well don’t say it in Latin, then.”
She said the old version at least had the “virtue of hoary tradition”.
On the grounds of what you might call aural aesthetics, she has a point. You don’t have to believe you’re saying thanks to a two-thousand-year-old dead person, any more than you’re literally calling for his (or his dad’s) blessings when you say “Bless you!” to a friend who’s just sneezed.
No comments:
Post a Comment
We welcome lively and challenging comments. However, please try to stay on topic, be polite and do not use abusive, racist or sexist language, and do not incite your readers to violence or other antisocial behaviour, or your comment will be deleted. This isn't censorship: it's a case of staying within the bounds of decency and having an eye to the law, although we realise the law will be different in different countries.
We do not bar anonymous comments at the moment, but we would prefer that those commenting play fair and use their name or at least a regular nom de plume. It does show a confidence in your convictions. We know, too, that it's easy to use a false name and be effectively anonymous, but, again, we appeal to your sense of good practice. Even a wacky nom de plume is better, since at least readers will come to know that contributor and maybe remember her or his previous comments.
Blatant commercial advertising will be removed.
Comments should not be construed as necessarily the policy or opinion of the Pink Triangle Trust.
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.