Pages

Monday, 14 September 2009

Islamists net their victims

This makes for very disturbing reading. It’s an account in Britain’s Observer newspaper of how Islamist gangs in Iraq use the Internet to track down, torture and kill gays.

It’s a fairly recent phenomenon, the account tells us, since homosexuality was not illegal in Saddam Hussein’s time, and there was even a healthy gay scene in the 1960s and 1970s.

The recent killings “are brutal, with victims ritually tortured”, says the newspaper, adding:

Azhar al-Saeed’s son was one. “He didn’t follow what Islamic doctrine tells but he was a good son,” she said. “Three days after his kidnapping, I found a note on my door with blood spread over it and a message saying it was my son’s purified blood and telling me where to find his body.” [. . .]

Hashim, another victim of violence by extremists, was attacked on Abu Nawas Street. Famous for its restaurants and bars, the street has become a symbol of the relative progress made in Baghdad. But it was where Hashim was set on by four men, had a finger cut off and was badly beaten. His assailants left a note warning that he had one month to marry and have “a traditional life” or die.

“Since that day I have not left my home. I’m too scared and don’t have money to run away,” Hashim said.

One of those responsible for the barbarity is 22-year-old Abu Hamizi, a computer graduate, who spends several hours a day searching Internet chatrooms.

“It is the easiest way to find those people who are destroying Islam and who want to dirty the reputation we took centuries to build up,” he’s quoted as saying.

1 comment:

We welcome lively and challenging comments. However, please try to stay on topic, be polite and do not use abusive, racist or sexist language, and do not incite your readers to violence or other antisocial behaviour, or your comment will be deleted. This isn't censorship: it's a case of staying within the bounds of decency and having an eye to the law, although we realise the law will be different in different countries.

We do not bar anonymous comments at the moment, but we would prefer that those commenting play fair and use their name or at least a regular nom de plume. It does show a confidence in your convictions. We know, too, that it's easy to use a false name and be effectively anonymous, but, again, we appeal to your sense of good practice. Even a wacky nom de plume is better, since at least readers will come to know that contributor and maybe remember her or his previous comments.

Blatant commercial advertising will be removed.

Comments should not be construed as necessarily the policy or opinion of the Pink Triangle Trust.

Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.