Pages

Wednesday, 9 September 2009

Three-way Boris

An interesting exercise in comparing A with A and with A again and finding that they’re all rather different, and thus finding out just what mendacity goes to make up a politician, is carried out in the Guardian this week by Dave Hill on his blog.

We reported a few days ago how Boris (“Gosh!”) Johnson urged non-Muslims to (“Gosh!”) jolly well go into a mosque after fasting for a day during Ramadan and (“Gosh!”) jolly well find out what it was like to be a Muslim.

Not only has Anne Widdecombe (well-known poof hater but occasional talker of common sense) taken issue with him in the Daily Express, saying such an act would just be patronising tokenism, but Hill has taken three quotes from Johnson: one just after 7/7, one later, and one the other day when he became all mosque-friendly.

It makes for sobering reading. Well, it ought to be sobering reading for Mr (“Gosh!”) Alexander Boris de Pfeffel Johnson.

One of the earliest quotes says, among other things, of Islam, “Judged purely on its scripture – to say nothing of what is preached in the mosques – it is the most viciously sectarian of all religions in its heartlessness towards unbelievers . . .”

A later one – in April 2008, as May’s mayoral election day approached – has him saying, “The problem is people who wrench out of context quotes from the holy book of Islam, the Koran, and use it to inspire evil in men's hearts. That is a fact that few serious people would deny and we need to tackle the extremists.”

Now he wants us to be a Muslim for a day. Gosh!

1 comment:

  1. I live in a Muslim country. Some Muslims are good, some are bad. Just like any other people. What i don't like about the 'system' in Islam is how they seem to want everyone to be sensitive to their needs and respect their religion, but it is not reciprocated by them.

    ReplyDelete

We welcome lively and challenging comments. However, please try to stay on topic, be polite and do not use abusive, racist or sexist language, and do not incite your readers to violence or other antisocial behaviour, or your comment will be deleted. This isn't censorship: it's a case of staying within the bounds of decency and having an eye to the law, although we realise the law will be different in different countries.

We do not bar anonymous comments at the moment, but we would prefer that those commenting play fair and use their name or at least a regular nom de plume. It does show a confidence in your convictions. We know, too, that it's easy to use a false name and be effectively anonymous, but, again, we appeal to your sense of good practice. Even a wacky nom de plume is better, since at least readers will come to know that contributor and maybe remember her or his previous comments.

Blatant commercial advertising will be removed.

Comments should not be construed as necessarily the policy or opinion of the Pink Triangle Trust.

Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.