The UK government, in its wisdom, has decided not to offer a posthumous pardon to the wartime code breaker Alan Turing after he was convicted of something called gross indecency.
There was a petition with some 23,000 signatures, triggering an Early Day Motion in the House of Commons – but to no avail, it seems.
You can read the story here.
gay and lesbian matters, rationalism, atheism, freethought, secularism — this is the weblog of the Pink Triangle Trust, the only gay humanist charity
Pages
▼
Tuesday, 7 February 2012
3 comments:
We welcome lively and challenging comments. However, please try to stay on topic, be polite and do not use abusive, racist or sexist language, and do not incite your readers to violence or other antisocial behaviour, or your comment will be deleted. This isn't censorship: it's a case of staying within the bounds of decency and having an eye to the law, although we realise the law will be different in different countries.
We do not bar anonymous comments at the moment, but we would prefer that those commenting play fair and use their name or at least a regular nom de plume. It does show a confidence in your convictions. We know, too, that it's easy to use a false name and be effectively anonymous, but, again, we appeal to your sense of good practice. Even a wacky nom de plume is better, since at least readers will come to know that contributor and maybe remember her or his previous comments.
Blatant commercial advertising will be removed.
Comments should not be construed as necessarily the policy or opinion of the Pink Triangle Trust.
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.
A shame really. He was a central figure in cryptography and computer and information science.
ReplyDeleteTuring was chemically castrated and driven to suicide by the religious bigots of his day http://seanrobsville.blogspot.com/2012/02/alan-turing-gay-buddhist.html
ReplyDeleteThis is a shame, in a way, but I do understand the reasoning behind the decision. If we start applying the standards of today retrospectively, where will it end? And what if fashions change in the future and legal decisions made today get overturned at some future date? Arguably, this is a just a convenient and politically correct gesture, a bit like the awarding of the Victoria Cross to a black squaddie a few years ago. We should be wary of these attempts to socially engineer changes in attitudes, no matter how well intentioned.
ReplyDelete