Pages

Wednesday, 29 February 2012

Let us pray … if you want to … in silence

Back to prayers again, and Cheltenham Borough Council in Gloucestershire has decided to hold a silence instead of prayers.

This could be a way forward. The Christians can’t complain that their dogma is being shoved out, because those councillors who take part can pray to whatever deity they like, or, if they have no beliefs, simply reflect on what they’re about to do and express the internal hope that their deliberations will be to the benefit of all.

This is an alternative to my suggestion in these posts that councillors who want to pray go to an anteroom (or as many rooms as there are different belief systems, if that’s desired) and do their thing there.

If compromise there has to be, then let it be this. The Cheltenham silence was led by a preacherman, but it doesn’t have to be.

2 comments:

  1. What's wrong with them just getting on with the business at hand? Why do they have to waste any time consorting with their invisible friends? They're supposed to be grown ups.

    I've decided that come council election time, anybody who wants my vote has to agree that they are opposed to prayers at council meetings.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Not to condemn you, I'm a mortal as much as yourselves. All of U.S. croak, right? Right. That's a given, brudda - even the atheist believes that much. But, yet, alas, our soul is indelible, meaning, it either goes Upstairs or downtown for the length and breadth of eternity, so don't live for the whorizontal anymore; live for the BIG-ol, kick-ass, party-hardy I'll be having when we bot-the-dust (past tense of BITE). Besides, atheism is just a denial of God which we certainly aren't too sure what's on the other side. God blessa youse -Fr. Sarducci, ol SNL

    ReplyDelete

We welcome lively and challenging comments. However, please try to stay on topic, be polite and do not use abusive, racist or sexist language, and do not incite your readers to violence or other antisocial behaviour, or your comment will be deleted. This isn't censorship: it's a case of staying within the bounds of decency and having an eye to the law, although we realise the law will be different in different countries.

We do not bar anonymous comments at the moment, but we would prefer that those commenting play fair and use their name or at least a regular nom de plume. It does show a confidence in your convictions. We know, too, that it's easy to use a false name and be effectively anonymous, but, again, we appeal to your sense of good practice. Even a wacky nom de plume is better, since at least readers will come to know that contributor and maybe remember her or his previous comments.

Blatant commercial advertising will be removed.

Comments should not be construed as necessarily the policy or opinion of the Pink Triangle Trust.

Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.